EFCC is alleging that the flat were N15 billion was discovered last month, is owned by wife of suspended NIA DG, Ambassador Ayo Oke, Folashade Oke. According to a statement released Friday evening, Mrs Oke purchased the flat with a whooping $1.6
million cash. Below is a press statement from the EFCC confirming the report.
The Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, EFCC, on Friday, May 5, 2017, has told Justice Muslim Hassan of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos how the wife of the suspended Director-
General of the National Intelligence Agency, NIA, Ayo Oke, Folashade, allegedly acquired
the property situated at Flat 7B, 13, Osbourne Road, Osbourne Towers, Ikoyi, Lagos, where the sums of $43,449,947, £27,800 and N23,218,000 were recently
recovered by the Commission.
The EFCC is seeking an order of final forfeiture of the recovered money to the Federal Government. Oke was said to have
made a cash payment of $1.658m for the purchase of the flat between August 25 and September 3, 2015 in the name of a company, Chobe Ventures Limited.
She and and her son, Ayodele Oke Junior, are said to be directors in the company.
Oke was also said to have made the cash payment in tranches of $700,000, $650,000
and $353,700 to a Bureau de Change company, Sulah Petroleum and Gas Limited, which later converted the sums into
N360,000,000 and subsequently paid it to Fine and Country Limited for the purchase of the property.
The prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, tendered as exhibit the receipt issued by Fine and Country Limited to Chobe Ventures
Limited.
According to Oyedepo, “The circumstances leading to the discovery of the huge sums
stockpiled in Flat 7B, Osborne Towers, leaves no one in doubt that the act was pursuant to an unlawful activity.
“The very act of making cash payment of $1.6m without going through any financial institution by Mrs. Folashade Oke for the acquisition of Flat 7B, Osborne Towers, is a criminal act
punishable by the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Amendment Act. I refer
My Lord to sections 1(a), 16(d) and
16(2)(b) of the Money Laundering
(Prohibition) Amendment Act. ”
Also, in the affidavit filed by the prosecution , Chobe Ventures, which is not into any business, was said to be merely incorporated to retain proceeds of
suspected unlawful activities of Oke.
While urging the court to order the permanent forfeiture of the funds to the Federal Government, Oyedepo argued that the property, which was purchased in a criminal manner, made the money recovered therein to be proceeds of unlawful acts.”
Oyedepo further said that that despite the newspaper advertisement of the initial
order of April 13, 2017 temporarily forfeiting the money to the Federal Government, no one showed up in court
today to show cause why the money should not be permanently forfeited to the
Federal Government.
Oyedepo also observed that Chobe
Ventures Limited, in whose apartment the huge sums were recovered, did not come
to court to challenge the forfeiture order, despite being served with the motion on notice at its registered address of No. 18
Ogunmodede street, off Allen Avenue, Ikeja, Lagos.
He added:
“The failure of Chobe Ventures
Limited, in whose custody these
properties we are seeking to forfeit were found, to show cause before My Lord today why the property (money) should not be forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria, Your Lordship should hold that Chobe Ventures Limited has admitted all the facts deposed to in our affidavit and order the final forfeiture of the property to
the Federal Government. ”
Earlier, by a lawyer, Olukoya Ogungbeje, had filed an application urging the court to
suspend further action in the forfeiture proceedings pending the outcome of the Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo three-man
panel constituted by President
Muhammadu Buhari to investigate the claim by the NIA boss, Oke, that the money belongs to the agency.
They further argued that the Commission had not yet identified the the owner of the
money as required by Section 44(2)(k) of the Constitution
However,Oyedepo urged the court to dismiss the lawyer’s application and award a heavy cost against him for seeking to waste the time of the court.
“I submit that coming to My Lord
through the back door by way of this application is a violent abuse of the processes of this court. The
application is standing in the way of justice and the applicant even lacks the locus standi to be a party in this suit, ” he added.
Justice Hassan adjourned the matter to June 6,2017.
