The senate today asked acting president, Yemi Osinbajo, to withdraw a statement he
made sometime in April that based on Section 171 of the Constitution, the executive doesn’t require legislative approval for the confirmation of some political appointments.
Shortly after the senate rejected the nomination of acting EFCC chairman, Ibrahim Magu, for the second time, Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo, granted an interview to some journalists in Abuja
where he said this (Read here).
“I’m fully in support of Magu as the EFCC chairman just as the president is.
It is up to the senate to make their judgement, and it is up to us say what we want to do. If our candidate is rejected, we can rep-resent him. No law says we can’t rep-resent him. And again, there is the other argument, whether or not we need to present him for confirmation and that’s a compelling argument from Femi
Falana. His argument is that under the constitution, section 171, and if you look at that section, it talks about the appointments that the president can make. They include appointments of ministers, ambassadors and heads of
agencies such as the EFCC. In that
same section 171, the constitution
rightly said that certain appointments must go to the senate such as ministerial and ambassadorial appointments.
Those of heads of agencies like the EFCC do not have to
go to the senate. That’s what the
constitution says. But the EFCC act,
which of course as you know is
inferior, says that EFCC chairman
should go to the senate for
confirmation. I am sure that even a pocket book lawyer knows that when a legislation conflicts with
constitution, it’s the constitution that prevails”he said in the interview During plenary today, a letter from his office seeking the confirmation of Lanra
Gbajabiamila as Chairman of the National Lottery Commission, was read by Senate President, Bukola Saraki, at the plenary. The
senators rejected the request, arguing that Osinbajo who had earlier said they have no
powers to confirm some appointees, cannot be forwarding names for confirmation to them.
They asked him to withdraw his statement just as they
suspended all issues relating to
confirmation from the Executive until such matters of confirmation as contained in the constitution were strictly adhered to.
